How Many Stories Am I Holding Up?

The film "Blindness" which is now in theaters offers the latest instance of what scholars David Mitchell and Sharon Snyder have called "narrative prosthesis" where in effect, disability is used as an artificial device to help what is otherwise a weak story line.

Blindness remains a frightening disability in no small measure because the literal condition, the disruption of the physical eye is invested with outworn symbolism that still resides in what the psychoanalyst Carl Jung called the cultural subconscious. People may know next to nothing about eye diseases but they know deep in their bones that there's something suggestive and darkly portentious about the blind.

In literature and film the blind have often functioned as a form of narrative prosthesis: their presence in the story is designed to deflect the reader's attention from the fact that the narrative is essentially uninteresting. Stevenson's "Blind Pew" is a classic example of the technique. Aside from evil blind figures there are hundreds of stories in which a blind man or woman is victimized. Never mind that blind people are no more likely to be victimized than anyone else--the imagined scenario is all that matters. Fear sells a bad story every time a strong imagination isn't doing the typing.

For more information about how the blind community is responding to the film visit this excellent link at the American Council of the Blind:

http://www.acb.org/press-releases/press-release_Blindness_the-movie.html

There are of course real lives in the balance. As I have said many times previously on this blog the unemployment rate for the blind remains unacceptably high in the United States and around the world. The film "Blindness" or the execrable novel that birthed it are guilty of false disability figuration--aesthetic choices that can only further harm real people.

S.K.

Comments

[bess]

thanks for summing this up so well.

I'm curious-- what do you think of the term "prosthesis" as a metaphor (as it shows up in a lot of theory/analysis)? I don't think it carries the negative connotation that "blind" does in so much writing/art (as in "blind faith" and so on), but nonetheless it is clearly removed from the actual object of a prosthetic. I don't really think awareness of disability issues means we discard all use of bodily metaphors, but.. well, curious to see if you have any thoughts.